Medellin vs texas

Caps Lock is on. Having Caps Lock on may cause you to enter your password incorrectly. Press Caps Lock to turn it off before entering your password.

In Medellin v. Texas - Member I: Self-Execution Medellin, this Law embraced a variant of the doctrine that originated inbound the 1960s, that has never previously been endorsing by the Supreme Court, also ensure is inconsistent with the body of and Supremacy Clause. As of 1900, there were three different variants of the doctrine.L'arrêt Medellín v. Texas ) est une décision de la Cour suprême des États-Unis, rendue le 25 mars 2008, et qui fait suite à un arrêt de la Cour internationale de justice du 31 mars 2004, Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals . En l'espèce, l'arrêt concernait l'application de la peine de mort au Texas, mais ses implications sont plus larges. L'arrêt de la Cour suprême ...Medellin v. Texas No. 06-984 Title: Jose Ernesto Medellin, Petitioner v. Texas Subject: Capital Cases, International Law, Presidential Authority, State Courts Question: In the Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mex. v. U.S.), I.C.J. No. 128 (judgment of Mar. 31, 2004), the International Court of Justice determined that 51 named ...Finding an affordable home in Texas can be a daunting task. With the cost of living rising, it can be difficult to find a home that fits within your budget. Fortunately, there are several strategies you can use to help you find an affordabl...Derecho Internacional Público – dipublico.org Cátedra I de Derecho Internacional Público de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas de la Universidad Católica de La Plata – ArgentinaMedellin v. Texas No. 06-984 Title: Jose Ernesto Medellin, Petitioner v. Texas Subject: Capital Cases, International Law, Presidential Authority, State Courts ...

Brief Fact Summary. Jose Medellin (D) appealed after Texas (P) convicted him of rape and murder on the ground that the plaintiff failed to inform him of his right to have consular personnel notified of his detention by the state as it was required under the Vienna Convention. During his appeal at the Supreme Court, Medellin (D) argued that a ...The US Supreme Court case of José Ernesto Medellín, Petitioner v. Texas, decided on 25 March 2008, has generally been seen as a US refusal to follow unambiguous treaty provisions.There has not been such a strong reaction to US behaviour relative to specific treaty obligations since the 1992 Alvarez-Machain case. The Supreme Court majority (six votes to three) held that 'neither Avena nor ...Medellin v. Texas illustrates the outgrowth of this debate.' In Medellin, the state of Texas refused to comply with the Interna-tional Court of Justice's ("ICJ") Avena decision, which had ruled that the United States had violated the Vienna Convention by failing to inform 51 Mexican nationals of their convention rightsLawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) A Texas law criminalizing consensual, sexual conduct between individuals of the same sex violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT. No. 02-102. Argued March 26, 2003-Decided June 26, 2003.Oct 9, 2007 · In Medellin v. Texas, the Supreme Court is taking a second look at the obligation – or lack of it — of American states to obey a judgment of the World Court on the legal rights of foreign nationals arrested and prosecuted for crimes in those states. Background. The modern Supreme Court finds itself in a global village of law.

Moved Permanently. Redirecting to /core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/article/abs/medellin-v-texasJOSE ERNESTO MEDELLIN. 06–984 (08A98) v. TEXAS on application to recall and stay mandate and for stay JOSE ERNESTO MEDELLIN 08–5573 (08A99) v. TEXAS on application for stay and petition for a writ of certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of texas In Re JOSE ERNESTO MEDELLIN. 08–5574 (08A99) 371 F.3d 270 - MEDELLIN v. DRETKE, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. 417 F.3d 145 - IGARTUA-DE LA ROSA v. U.S., United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. ... MEDELLIN v. TEXAS, Supreme Court of United States. 127 S.Ct. 2129 - ROGERS v. CALIFORNIA, Supreme Court of United States.But the case Ted Cruz talks about the most is Medellin v. Texas . In 2005 and again in 2007, Cruz was put in the intriguing position of, in essence, going up against President George W. Bush.Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly ...

Para y por.

Texas, a 2008 death penalty case involving the proper interpretation of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. Join the Constitutional Law Center to hear Alan Mygatt-Tauber discuss these issues based on his new book, Medellín v. Texas: International Law, Federalism, and the Execution of Jose Medellín.Reynolds v US Reynolds challenged the anti-bigamy law by taking on another wife in Utah but was convicted. Result: The anti-bigamy statue does not violate the 1st Amendment free exercise because the statute may punish without regard to religious belief.Medellin v. Texas. Brief. Citation. 552 U.S 491 (2008) Brief Fact Summary. The International Court of Justice held that 51 Mexican nationals convicted and sentenced in Texas state courts were entitled to review of their convictions under the Vienna Convention. A Texas law barred subsequent habeas corpus petitions.The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals upheld the conviction and sentence on March 16,. 1997,29 over a year before Paraguay filed the Breard case in the ICJ.Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that held even when a treaty constitutes an international commitment, it is not binding domestic law unless it has been implemented by an act of the U.S. Congress or contains language expressing that it is "self-executing" upon ratification. The Court also ruled that decisions of the International Court ...Nicolas is noteworthy as the first decision in which a foreign court considered the effect of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Medellin v. Texas on an agreement concluded with the President of the United States but not ratified by the U.S. Senate (a ‘sole-executive agreement’). This...

The US Supreme Court case of José Ernesto Medellín, Petitioner v. Texas, decided on 25 March 2008, has generally been seen as a US refusal to follow unambiguous treaty provisions. There has not been such a strong reaction to US behaviour relative to specific treaty obligations since the 1992 Alvarez-Machain case.14 Medellin v. Texas ▻ Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ▻ Vienna Convention granted him an individual right that state courts must respect ▻ Constitution ...We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.As I have mentioned, there may be a federal statutory problem with the Supreme Court giving relief in this case, but if this goes to Texas state courts, the ...95 V. Epps, ‘Violations of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations - Time for Remedies’, (2004) 11 Willamette Journal International Law & Dispute Resolution 1; L. J. Springrose, ‘Strangers in a Strange Land - The Rights of Non-Citizens under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations’, (1999) 14 Georgetown Immigration …Jan 1, 2021 · Medellín v. Texas - Volume 136. Held (by six votes to three Footnote 2):—. The decision of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals was affirmed. [Page 691] (1) The Vienna Convention imposed an international legal obligation on the United States, but not all such obligations automatically constituted binding federal law that might be enforced in United States courts. September 23, 1993 — Medellin was charged for the gang rape and murder of two teenagers in Houston, Texas. September 16, 1994 — Medellin was found guilty for the murders of the teenagers. October 11, 1994 — Following a separate punishment hearing, Medellin was sentenced to death. March 26, 1998 — Medellin filed an application for a ...Caso Medellín vs. Texas, 128 S. Ct. 1346 (US 2008) (Núm. 06–984) 28/07/2023 Jurisprudencia Comentarios desactivados en Caso Medellín vs. Texas, 128 S. Ct. 1346 (US 2008) (Núm. 06–984) MEDELLIN v. TEXAS CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS No. 06-984.United States Supreme Court. MEDELLIN v.TEXAS(2008) No. 06-984 Argued: October 10, 2007 Decided: March 25, 2008. In the Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mex. v. U. S.), 2004 I. C. J. 12 (Avena), the International Court of Justice (ICJ) held that the United States had violated Article 36(1)(b) of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Vienna Convention or Convention) by ...Medellín v. Texas, 552 US 491 (2008), es unadecisión de la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos que sostuvo que incluso si un tratado internacional puede constituir un compromiso internacional, no es una ley nacional vinculante a menos que el Congreso de los Estados Unidos haya promulgado leyes que lo implementen o el tratado en sí es " autoejecutable ". [1]Mar 30, 2008 · Medellin v. Texas: A case of more than murder. Fifteen years ago, in a crime that shocked the conscience of this city, two teenage girls were brutally gang-raped and murdered, strangled with a ...

No. 06-984. In the Supreme Court of the United States. JOSE ERNESTO MEDELLIN, PETITIONER. v. STATE OF TEXAS. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI. TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS. BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES. AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING PETITIONER.

TED CRUZ*. In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Medellin v. Texas,^ a. case that implicated virtually every conceivable axis of the. structural limitations on government. President vis-à-vis Con-. gress, President vis-à-vis the Supreme Court, intemational law. vis-à-vis domestic law, federal govemment vis-à-vis the States, and, with a ...Donovan Muñoz, Alejandro Varona, Ludwing Daniel Pérez . Oct 29, 2022 07:09 07:09Medellin v. Texas. Share. Tweet. Email. On March 25, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Medellin v. Texas (No. 06-984) that the President does not have the authority to order states to bypass their …Volver a los detalles del artículo Caso Medellín vs. Texas. Comentarios al fallo de la Suprema Corte de los Estados Unidos, así como a la solicitud de interpretación del fallo Avena del 31 de marzo de 2004, presentada a la Corte Internacional de Justicia por México en junio de 2008Medellin v. Texas: A case of more than murder. Fifteen years ago, in a crime that shocked the conscience of this city, two teenage girls were brutally gang-raped and murdered, strangled with a ...Abstract. In Medellín v. Texas, 128 S.Ct. 1346 (2008), a 6-3 majority of the U.S. Supreme Court held that the decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Avena case (Mex. v. U.S.), 2004 ICJ Rep. 12 (Mar. 31), was not automatically binding as domestic law within the United States, and that the president, absent a congressional act, lacked the power to enforce the Avena decision ...September 23, 1993 — Medellin was charged for the gang rape and murder of two teenagers in Houston, Texas. September 16, 1994 — Medellin was found guilty for the murders of the teenagers. October 11, 1994 — Following a separate punishment hearing, Medellin was sentenced to death. March 26, 1998 — Medellin filed an application for a ...

Anezka.

Chick fil a rolla photos.

Texas is home to some of the biggest and best RV dealers in the country. With a wide variety of options, it can be difficult to know which one is right for you. That’s why we’ve put together this guide to the biggest RV dealers in Texas.This essay analyzes from a critical point of view the judgment of the United States Supreme Court in the case Medellín vs. Texas, rendered on 25 June 2008, in which the Court decides that neither ...caso medellÍn vs. texas. comentarios al fallo de la suprema corte de los estados unidos asÍ como a la solicitud de intepretaciÓn del fallo avena del 31 de marzo de 2004, presentada a la corte internacional de justicia por mÉxico en junio de 2008 * pablo a. arrocha olabuenaga ** sumario: i. introducción.Texas, has restated that some treaties are not "self-executing." Such treaties must be implemented by statute before their provisions may be given effect by national and sub-national courts. Similarly with regard to customary international law, its Supreme Court stated, in the case of the Pacquete Habana (1900), that "international law is part ...MEDELLIN v. TEXAS CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS No. 06-984. Argued October 10, 2007—Decided March 25, 2008 In the Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mex. v. U. S.), 2004 I. C. J. 12 (Avena), the International Court of Justice (ICJ) held that the United …Facts of the Case. Provided by Oyez. An Oklahoma law prohibited persons who were not licensed optometrists or ophthalmologists to fit lenses for eyeglasses. Non-licensed individuals were also prohibited from duplicating optical instruments without written prescriptions from licensed ophthalmologists. The Lee Optical Company challenged the law.May 18, 2009 ... MEDELLÍN V. TEXAS. 197. II. THE OPINIONS. A. Majority Rules: The Court's ... did not influence Texas's decision to execute Medellín, and Texas's.There, she was the Senior Articles Editor of the American University Law Review, in which she also published an article on the President's preemption powers after Medellín v. Texas. <br><br>Ms.MEDELLIN v. TEXAS. certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of texas. No. 06-984. Argued October 10, 2007—Decided March 25, 2008. In the Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals ( Mex. v. U. S. ), 2004 I. C. J. 12 ( Avena ), the International Court of Justice (ICJ) held that the United States had violated Article 36 (1) (b) of ...95 V. Epps, ‘Violations of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations - Time for Remedies’, (2004) 11 Willamette Journal International Law & Dispute Resolution 1; L. J. Springrose, ‘Strangers in a Strange Land - The Rights of Non-Citizens under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations’, (1999) 14 Georgetown Immigration …MEDELLIN v. TEXAS. certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of texas. No. 06–984. Argued October 10, 2007—Decided March 25, 2008. ….

The Texas authorities did not inform him of this, and on this basis he appealed. He ultimately lost on March 25, 2008, when a five-four split Supreme Court held in Medellin v. Texas that the United States' participation in the VCCR did not trump Texan authority to conduct its businessOct 21, 2014 · No. 06-984. In the Supreme Court of the United States. JOSE ERNESTO MEDELLIN, PETITIONER. v. STATE OF TEXAS. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI. TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS. BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES. AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING PETITIONER. Facts of the case. A Texas trial court sentenced Medellin, a Mexican citizen, to death for participating in the gang rape and murder of two girls in 1993. A state appeals court affirmed the conviction. Medellin then filed a state habeas corpus action, claiming that Texas failed to notify him of his right to counsel under the Vienna Convention.Medellín v. Texas SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 128 S.Ct. 1436 (2008) Author’s Note: You studied the International Court of Justice (I.C.J.) Avena case in §2.7. In 2004, the I.C.J. issued an interim order to the U.S. It prohibited the execution of any of the fifty- According to the Texas Department of State Health Services, a person has to be at least 18 years old to get a tattoo in Texas. Under supervision of a parent, a minor is allowed to have a tattoo covered or removed.The result is that states may enact laws inconsistent with non-self-executing treaties until those treaties are executed. The Court’s recent decision in Medellín v. Texas confirms and illustrates this point. Mexican national Jose Ernesto Medellín was sentenced to death in Texas for his participation in the gang rape and murder of two ...Abstract. In Medellín v. Texas, 128 S.Ct. 1346 (2008), a 6-3 majority of the U.S. Supreme Court held that the decision of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in …MEDELLIN v. TEXAS. certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of texas. No. 06-984. Argued October 10, 2007—Decided March 25, 2008. In the Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mex. v. U. S.), 2004 I. C. J. 12 (Avena), the International Court of Justice (ICJ) held that the United States had violated Article 36(1)(b) of the ... Medellin vs texas, Caso Medellín vs. Texas, 128 S. Ct. 1346 (US 2008) (Núm. 06–984) 28/07/2023 Jurisprudencia Comentarios desactivados en Caso Medellín vs. Texas, 128 S. Ct. 1346 (US 2008) (Núm. 06–984) MEDELLIN v. TEXAS CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS No. 06-984., Mar 1, 2009 · Texas, decided by the US Supreme Court on 25 March 2008, must be read. Footnote 26 Medellín, a Mexican national, was arrested in 1993 for the gang rape and murder of two teenagers. Footnote 27 Within a few hours of his arrest, he signed a waiver and provided a written confession. , The US Supreme Court case of José Ernesto Medellín, Petitioner v. Texas, decided on 25 March 2008, has generally been seen as a US refusal to follow unambiguous treaty provisions. There has not been such a strong reaction to US behaviour relative to specific treaty obligations since the 1992 Alvarez-Machain case., Oct 10, 2007 · Medellin v. Texas Media Oral Argument - October 10, 2007 Opinion Announcement - March 25, 2008 Opinions Syllabus Opinion of the Court (Roberts) Concurring opinion (Stevens) Dissenting opinion Petitioner Jose Ernesto Medellin Respondent State of Texas Docket no. 06-984 Decided by Roberts Court Lower court Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Citation , Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491, 499 (2008) (third and fourth alterations in original). (quoting Vienna Convention, supra note 2, 21 ..., Hace unos días -25 de marzo- la Suprema Corte de EU, resolvió el Caso “Medellín vs Texas”. La Suprema Corte de EUA vistió jurídicamente el incumplimiento de un tratado. México le había ganado a EU un litigio sobre el incumplimiento de sus obligaciones internacionales -dar aviso a las autoridades mexicanas de nacionales suyos procesados …, Death records are an important part of family history and genealogy research. If you’re looking for Texas death records, there are a few ways to go about it. This article will provide information on how to find Texas death records., ... Medellin v. Texas案中宣告聯合國憲章第九十四條之規定不能自動履行，其論述為自動履行理論之發展帶來重要影響，並因此遭受批評。之所以如此，係因美國在自動履行之 ..., Medellín v. Texas SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 128 S.Ct. 1436 (2008) Author’s Note: You studied the International Court of Justice (I.C.J.) Avena case in §2.7. In 2004, the I.C.J. issued an interim order to the U.S. It prohibited the execution of any of the fifty-, Facts of the case. Jose Medellin, a Mexican national, was convicted and sentenced to death for participating in the gang rape and murder of two teenage girls in Houston. Medellin raised a post-conviction challenge arguing that the state had violated his rights under the Vienna Convention, a treaty to which the United States is a party., Breyer, J., Dissenting, Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008). BVerfG, Judgment of the Second Senate of 30 June 2009 – 2 BvE 2/08. Case of Al-Skeini and Others v. UK, Judgment delivered by Grand Chamber of ECHR. Case of Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, Judgment delivered by Third Section of ECHR, 7 February 2017. …, Mar 1, 2009 · Texas, decided by the US Supreme Court on 25 March 2008, must be read. Footnote 26 Medellín, a Mexican national, was arrested in 1993 for the gang rape and murder of two teenagers. Footnote 27 Within a few hours of his arrest, he signed a waiver and provided a written confession. , TED CRUZ*. In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Medellin v. Texas,^ a. case that implicated virtually every conceivable axis of the. structural limitations on government. President vis-à-vis Con-. gress, President vis-à-vis the Supreme Court, intemational law. vis-à-vis domestic law, federal govemment vis-à-vis the States, and, with a ..., Mar 28 2008. Medellin v. Texas - Part I: Self-Execution. Online Debate. On March 25, 2008 the Supreme Court decided the Medellin v. Texas case. The Court ruled that neither Avena nor the President's Memorandum constitutes directly enforceable federal law that pre-empts state limitations on the filing of successive habeas petitions., Sep 22, 2022 · This petition was granted on April 30, 2007. On August 22, 2007, MSLF filed its friend of the court brief in support of the State of Texas. Oral argument was held on October 10, 2007. Case Summary Issue: Whether President Bush exceeded his authority in ordering the State of Texas to comply with an international treaty and must Texas ignore the ... , Mar 28 2008. Medellin v. Texas - Part I: Self-Execution. Online Debate. On March 25, 2008 the Supreme Court decided the Medellin v. Texas case. The Court ruled that neither Avena nor the President's Memorandum constitutes directly enforceable federal law that pre-empts state limitations on the filing of successive habeas petitions. , Medellín v. Teksas (552 US 491 (2008)) to orzeczenie Sądu Najwyższego Stanów Zjednoczonych wydane w dniu 25 marca 2008, i który jest następstwem wyroku Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości z dnia 31 marca 2004, Sprawa dotycząca Aveny i innych obywateli Meksyku (Mex. V. USA).W tej sprawie wyrok dotyczył …, Facts of the Case. Provided by Oyez. An Oklahoma law prohibited persons who were not licensed optometrists or ophthalmologists to fit lenses for eyeglasses. Non-licensed individuals were also prohibited from duplicating optical instruments without written prescriptions from licensed ophthalmologists. The Lee Optical Company challenged the law., Aug 5, 2008 · In Medellin v. Texas, 554 U.S. 759 (2008) (Medellin II),the Supreme Court explained: "It is up to Congress whether to implement obligations undertaken under a treaty which (like this one) does not itself have the force and effect of domestic law sufficient to set aside the judgment or the ensuring sentence." Summary of this case from United ... , Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that held even when a treaty constitutes an international commitment, it is not binding domestic law unless it has been implemented by an act of the U.S. Congress or contains language expressing … See more, caso medellÍn vs. texas. comentarios al fallo de la suprema corte de los estados unidos, asÍ como a la solicitud de interpretaciÓn del fallo avena del 31 de marzo de 2004, presentada a la corte internacional de justicia por mÉxico en junio de 2008 anuario mexicano de derecho internacional, vol. ix, 2009, pp. 677-705, Jan 8, 2014 ... As Solicitor General of Texas, I had the privilege of arguing Medellín v. Texas, which recognized critical limits on the federal ..., Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008), adalah sebuah putusan Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat yang memutuskan bahwa meskipun sebuah perjanjian internasional dapat membentuk sebuah komitmen internasional, perjanjian tersebut tidak berlaku sebagai hukum domestik kecuali Kongres Amerika Serikat telah membentuk peraturan pelaksana …, She counsels clients through all phases of litigation in state and federal courts throughout Texas. Berenice represents clients in litigation matters in the ..., Are you looking to explore the Lone Star State in a unique way? Purchasing a used RV is a great way to save money and have an unforgettable adventure. Here are some tips to help you find the perfect used RV for your Texas adventure., Buying a home can be a daunting task, especially if you’re looking for a low-cost option. Texas is known for its affordable housing, but there are still some important things to consider before making the purchase. Here’s what you need to k..., Caso Medellín vs. Texas, 128 S. Ct. 1346 (US 2008) (Núm. 06–984) 28/07/2023 Jurisprudencia Comentarios desactivados en Caso Medellín vs. Texas, 128 S. Ct. 1346 (US 2008) (Núm. 06–984) MEDELLIN v. TEXAS CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS No. 06-984., Oct 10, 2007 · Commentary: The Executive Power Question Might Not be the Most Important Aspect of Medellin (Marty Lederman, March 25, 2008) States win over President on criminal law issue (Lyle Denniston, March 25, 2008) Analysis: How to say no to the President? (Lyle Denniston, October 10, 2007) Argument preview: Medellin v. , See, e.g., Case Concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light & Power Co. (Belg. v. Spain), 1970 I. C. J. 3 (Judgment of Feb. 5) (claim brought by Belgium on behalf of Belgian nationals and shareholders); Case Concerning the Protection of French Nationals and Protected Persons in Egypt (Fr. v. Egypt), 1950 I. C. J. 59 (Order of Mar. 29) (claim ... , caso medellÍn vs. texas. comentarios al fallo de la suprema corte de los estados unidos asÍ como a la solicitud de intepretaciÓn del fallo avena del 31 de marzo de 2004, presentada a la corte internacional de justicia por mÉxico en junio de 2008 * pablo a. arrocha olabuenaga ** sumario: i. introducción., Facts of the case. Jose Medellin, a Mexican national, was convicted and sentenced to death for participating in the gang rape and murder of two teenage girls in Houston. Medellin raised a post-conviction challenge arguing that the state had violated his rights under the Vienna Convention, a treaty to which the United States is a party. , Commentary: The Executive Power Question Might Not be the Most Important Aspect of Medellin (Marty Lederman, March 25, 2008) States win over President on criminal law issue (Lyle Denniston, March 25, 2008) Analysis: How to say no to the President? (Lyle Denniston, October 10, 2007) Argument preview: Medellin v., Brief Fact Summary. Jose Medellin (D) appealed after Texas (P) convicted him of rape and murder on the ground that the plaintiff failed to inform him of his right to have consular …